Aug 26

It might shock you to know that even your payday loans can have an impact on your credit rating even though the provider does not conduct a credit check. Just as it is the case with the other providers, even the payday loan providers will have to report details of who gets the finance and this has a rebound effect on the credit rating.

But you will surely want to know if this is a negative thing?

For one, if you pay back the loan on time and on the said date, it will certainly not impact your credit rating negatively. But the truth is that your credit rating will in fact, improve a bit.

A credit score is one that is generally offered to every customer. This is usually applied by financial institutions to decide the creditworthiness of a person and thereby come to conclusion if it is alright to lend to someone who has historically had a negative score on their credit report. If you default on your payments, have cards that have continuously been at their limit, or if you did not seek credit in the past, then your credit score might just endure.

But, every time you pay a direct debit, or pay up your loan, then it will get a boost.

Read more…

Tags: Credit Rating, Payday Loans, Rating

Aug 26

We are excited to announce that we have added Watchfinder.co.uk to our stable of merchants. Watchfinder offer luxury and quality timepieces at an affordable price.  And, based on an average basket size, you could earn £125 for just one sale!

Watchfinder was established 10 years ago to fill a gap in the marketplace for buying quality watches online. It is now Europe’s leading pre-owned watch retailer, offering luxury brands such as Cartier, Rolex and Omega to name a few, at irresistible prices.

Their service is easy to use, backed with peace of mind that you are buying a new or preloved luxury watch that comes with a 12 month warranty.

Just pick the watch you want and Watchfinder will offer you the choice of either a brand new watch or a selection of pre-owned watches, all available straight away.

Why would you buy a pre-loved watch?

  • affordable luxury – designer watches at affordable prices – especially relevant in today’s tough economic climate;
  • watchfinder offer a 12 month warranty;
  • watches, like cars, depreciate in their first few months of life. By purcha

Read more…

Aug 26

People get excited about the prospect of cramming down mortgages on investment properties in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. I received at least two calls this past week from people interested in using Chapter 13 to both strip a second mortgage on their homestead and reduce the mortgage balance on at least one rental property.

Sounds like a plan, but unfortunately the plan usually does not work because of Chapter 13 bankruptcy’s unsecured debt ceiling. You cannot file Chapter 13 bankruptcy if your total unsecured debt exceeds about $330,000. Most courts, including the Orlando bankruptcy court, considers as part of the unsecured debt load, the total amount of stripped-off second mortgages on the debtor’s homestead as well as amounts crammed down (“reduced”, “wiped clean”) on the debtor’s investment property mortgages. You also have to watch out for the secured debt ceiling of approximately $1.1 million.

The debtor seeking to cram down or strip mortgages in Chapter 13 has to navigate the two debt ceilings in designing a Chapter 13 plan. The debtor has some control over the valuation of his properties when he proposes a Chapter 13 plan and mortgage reduction. The Chapter 1

Read more…

Tags: Chapter, Chapter 13

Aug 25

The study relies on some questionable assumptions and, I believe, comes to a wrong conclusion.  Even without repatriation, the combination of the foreign tax credit and US MNEs’ ability to manipulate their income results in very low tax rates on repatriated income.  With repatriation, the tax rate may even be negative.  There are almost no benefits that accrue to the US from repatriation, while the benefits to MNEs are substantial.

The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated that another rendition of the 2004 repatriation provision (part of the cornucopia of corporate tax benefits passed by the Bush Administration and responsible for lowering even further the tax-haven effective tax rates actually paid by US corporations) will cost about $80 billion over the ten years from 2011 to 2021.

Yet a corporate coalition–the alliance that has been pushing repatriation for months, on grounds of increasing ‘competitiveness’ and ‘job creation’– and their corporatist allies in Congress (especially on the right) are nonetheless pushing passage of a new “one-time” repatriation provision.  (The fact that the original repatriation provision was also a “one-time provision” and yet they are lobbying for a second iteration is something easily glided over in this age of reckless legislating.)  

This is all occurring at a time when the rightwing GOP in the House and Senate has pushed to reduce US spending for social justice programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security on the claim that its highest priority is reducing the US deficit.  That right-wing fringe refuses tax increases–even to restore the series of huge Bush tax cuts that moved us from surplus to deficit–and it engaged in economic terrorism to walk to the cliff edge on default on the US debt in order to get the kind of spending cuts it wanted.

The repatriation study is by “economic consultants” Robert Shapiro &  Aparna Mathur (American Enterprise Institute), The Revenue Implications of Temporary Tax Relief for Repatriated Foreign Earnings: An Analysis of the Joint Tax Committee’s Revenue Estimates, NDN (Aug. 25, 2011).

< Read more…

Aug 24

On my flight from Lisbon to Heathrow, I read “The Great Holiday Spending Racket,” a scathing article from an English newspaper about how innocent tourists were being scammed by 5%. The ploy goes a bit like this. After handing over her credit card in a foreign country, a customer is prompted, “Would you like to pay in pounds or Euros?” Many tourists prefer to pay in their local currency—pounds in this case—so they know exactly what will show up on their monthly bill. What they do not know is that the retailer will convert the purchase price with a terrible exchange rate, essentially charging 5% more than the sticker price. Fascinated by this practice, I ripped out the article and planned to ask Londoners if it had ever happened to them.

A few hours later, I handed over my credit card to pay for hotel breakfast. Shockingly, the receipt had a price in USD! The small print at the bottom claimed that my signature meant acceptance of the retailer’s exchange rate (or the retailer’s bank’s rate, most likely). I promptly refused and asked to be charged in pounds, saving me about 4%.

So, next time you’re in Europe, I highly recommend looking for the local currency on your receipts, and asking for another receipt if you see “USD” or “$.” The extra 10 seconds of hassle are worth it. As always, remember to brin

Read more…

Page 1 of 212